BU2

ROLE OF PRACTITIONER
in determining positive and negative impact in development process at different scales

T2.S6.R3_ Role of planning scholars
as a researcher - total involvement and detachment
consider both as scientist and as person
five roles for planning scholars

  1. scholars as independent outsiders
  2. scholars as public planners
  3. scholars as contractor
  4. scholar as community based planner
  5. scholar as activtist

T1.S7.R2_ The operations of Spatial agency
Intiating, Appropriating, making things visible, networking sharing knowledge

T1.S9.R4_Role of community architect in upgrading and reflecting on experience in Asia ( Refer for examples)

T1.S7.R3 Urban design for a planet of informal cities
informality as continum
forma-informal as duality
examples

T1.S8.R2 Reimagining Participatory design : Reflecting on ASF
(Refer the table for buzzword)


KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION


2015_Discuss how different modes of knowledge production impact spatial outcomes of urban design practices

PRODUCTION OF SPACE & SCALES


2015_Participation in development project shapes production of space in different scales


2013_Participatory process within development process can have simultaneously positive and negative impacts in different scales. Draw on example , concepts and argumentations from lectures and readings, to discuss and critically examine this statement , particularly reflecting on the role of development practitioner when navigating through such controversies.

T2.S3.R4_Reasoning To Scale

Camila's Presentation on scale BU3

T1.S2.R3_Knowledge, learning, and development: a post-rationalist approach

"TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIALS & TYRANNY OF PARTICIPATION
2013_if you were asked to make an analysis of a participatory design initiative and to assess it successes o failures , which would be the components you would integrate and what would be the concepts you draw upon ? Out line and argue why and how these concepts of analysis are important

ETHICS OF ENGAGEMENT
2015_Critically reflect on the ethics of engagement in participatory urban design

T1.S9.R1_Designing Ethics

SPACE & POLITICS
2015_Discuss how participatory urban process can transform space and its embedded power relationships

T2.S1.R1 _Collaboration and the Conflictual

T2.S3.R2_Governane and network: organizing from inside out

METHOLOGICAL REPERTOIRE FOR CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT
2015_What are the potential implication of selecting a particular methodlogical reportoire for citizens engagement

CONFLICT AND POWER ARE INHERENT TO PARTICIPATION PROCESS

T1: S1, R4

T2.S3.R3_Governance and Networks: Organising from inside out

T2.S8

T2.S9

T1.S3.R2_Towards Participation as transformation

POSITIONALITY & SPACE-POWER-KNOWLEDGE
2014_Thinking about participatory approaches in settlement upgrading projects ,
discuss how the concepts and theories of positionality , space, power, and knowledge comes into play and how are they inter-related


2013_'Participation has become part of orthodox planning methods, used by developers and government to placate people when projects and changes are about influence the area where they live. Consequently participatory processes have lost their use, the spatial practitioners are demoted but the people do not accede to power


What is your reaction to this statement? What is your position and explain it using your insights from the course, the concept discussed and the theory.

T2.S5.R3_Situating Knowledg, Positionality and

T2.S2.R1_From Abstract into Concrete

T2.S2.R2_When Stranger become Neighbour
idea of managing co-existence
dialogue

T1.S7,R1_ The Negotiation of Hope

T1.S9.R3_Citizen Design