Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
'Gun Nation' (The Guardian 2016) (Powerful, protecting, my freedom…
'Gun Nation' (The Guardian 2016)
Powerful, protecting, my freedom, a right-wing lunnatic
grim result of these weapons, newspaper headlines the same after a massacre
Why despite the death toll, there is opposition to even moderate gun laws in the US
Looking out for my family, neighbours
Taking guns away is ludicrous, from the law abiding citizens, the bad will always have guns
Stay away from me and my home
Don't ever turn over your weapons to your government. Every time they pass another gun safety law, they promise safety, so did Hitler
Want to be able to defend their families, gun don't kill a people, people kill a people
Guns could have been used by anyone, anywhere, can carry guns everywhere, prefer if guns weren't so widespread
Definitely prepared. Home invasions, highways shootings.
Most people that kill other people are law abiding citizens, by mistake, in anger or by accident
Presence of a gun more likely to create a death than protect a family from vigilante
Columbine 1999, two young men opened fire on students outside and then went inside and kept shooting, went worse as the day went on
End of the country if they hand over there guns, would protect rights of the country
Regulation leads to more regulation, its a slippery slope
The 2nd amendment guarantee's right to bear arms for protection and liberty
Mass students commonplace, especially Sandy Hook, the teachers should have had guns, people always sense the possibility
Gun lobby much more successful in getting their message out much better than those who want gun safety reform. Either for or against the second amendment , for freedom or against it
Once mass shootings happen, gun sales go up
Black market dealers- no background check, sell to anyone