Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Breadth (Multiple viewpoints (Gathered data from 6 different databases, 76…
Breadth
-
-
-
did the article enter the opposing views in good faith or only enough to find flaws in the article/other articles?
authors realized that there were issues with some of the research articles that were used and addressed how these factors affected the reliability of the study.
-
Is the article failing to consider this issue from an opposing perspective because I am not open to changing my view?
The article considers issues from opposing perspective because it addresses that there are problems with some of the articles that were used
-
most common risk of bias in the RCTs were the lack of proper allocation techniques and lack of blinding of outcome assessors and participants.
-
Some of the studies had multiple interventions that were being used so it is difficult to determine if the intervention that was being focused on had an effect on the shoulder injuries.
-