GMO Morgan S.
Benifits
Conecrns
Not enough for testing
Animal safety and not being cruel to animals
Bad side effects
Confusion in labeling
Allergic reactions
Obesity in animals
Environmental protection
GMO salmon are cooped up in farms and can spread diesease
Resistant to the dieses and/or virus
More nutrition
Slow plant growth
GMO papya is resistant to the ringspot virus
GMO foods could withstand harsh climate conditions
Drought resistant GMOS
Corn
Help end world hunger
Longer Shelf life
GMO tomatoes are engineered to have a longer shelf life
25 pounds more crops than the natural papaya
3.1 million children died from maulnutrition
Claim: One major benefit is that GMOs will increase production and help the starving because they can be grown easier
Claim: one major concern is that there are not enough testing in the side effects of gmos and the lack of labeling in stores
Evidence: Where a head of the company of gmos talked about how gmos can end world hunger
Counterclaim: What if they can cause harm and we are mass producing them. What if they are not researched enough to be safe. Evidence: Salmon are cooped up in farms and could spread disease.
Argument: If they haven't caused disease we are not sure it could happen
Evidence: According to a website, gmos never had a lot of testing and they said that the labeling is hard to tell in stores
Counterclaim: I agree, but like in the man in the ted ed video stated, GMOs have killed no one so far.
They might soon because they could forget the side effects of a gene they added to the food which could cause disease