Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Testing "As a PBV I want to run LPA to create WP's automatically…
Testing "As a PBV I want to run LPA to create WP's automatically for every groundslot in AMS"
8-3-2017, Roy ten Have
Zoom out
For the Narrow Body fleet, PBV's would like to use the LPA (Line Planning Automation) functionality in Maintenix to be able to schedule Turn Checks for every groundslot in AMS.
Using LPA for an a/c type is limited to either using it only for outstations, or using it only for 'home base'. Therefore, LPA will not be used to create TC Work Packages on Outstations for the Narrow Body fleet.
Scenario's
Prerequisites
Set up flights that result in 4 ground slots in AMS and Narrow Body tail and a Wide Body tail:
Flight 1: Outstation -> AMS
Flight 2: AMS -> Outstation
Flight 3: Outstation -> AMS
Flight 4: AMS -> Outstation
Flight 5: Outstation -> AMS
Flight 6: AMS -> Outstation
Flight 7: Oustation -> AMS
Flight 8: AMS -> Outstation
Primary Flow
-
:check: S02 Running LPA for a Wide Body results in TC Work Packages for every Outstation ground slot
-
-
Risks
R02 - LPA prefers the 'Number of the WP's needed' above 'scheduled time of a WP' when it comes to re-scheduling due to changes of the number of ground slots. (i.e. adding a groundslot shifts current WP's to the left, while a cancelled ground slot results in cancelling of the last WP).
R01 - As LPA reschedules TC Work Packages, any Tasks/Faults which are manually assigned to these Work Packages are also at risk of being re-scheduled.
R03 - Work Packages in 'COMMIT' state are unaffected by all LPA functionality (rescheduling, cancelling). When not actively verifying the status of a WP, this might result in unexpected results for the PBV.
-
-
-