Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Americans with Disabilities Act (standard search) (Ch. 2. Title I:…
Americans with Disabilities Act (standard search)
Ch 1: An Overview
Subsection 1:1 In General
Subsection 1:12 The EEOC
Ch. 2. Title I: Employment;
"The medical center is a covered employer as defined in the ADA Ch. 2:2. Covered employers"
Ch. 2:3 Prohibited practices
Boolean search: "essential functions" in "All Federal" jurisdiction
Ward v. Massachusetts Health Research Institute C.A.1 (Mass.)April 12, 2000 209 F.3d 29
Phelps v. Optima Health
Boolean search "essential functions" in 8th Circuit jurisdiction
EEOC v. Walmart
Boolean search "perform essential functions" and "perform! essential function!" in 8th circuit - 1st search was better deleted 2nd search
ALR Federal "Who is 'Qualified individual' under ADA" - can I tie this to "essential functions", does being able to perform them make you a qualified individual?
Boolean search "reasonable accommodations" in "All Federal" jurisdiction
McBride v. BIC Consumer Products
Key # 75k1225(2) - What are reasonable accommodations
US EEOC v. St. Joseph's Hospital
Jurisdiction change to 8th Circuit: Gesinger v. Burwell
Headnote 38
29 U.S.C.A Section 701: Findings; purpose; policy
Kiel v. Select Artificials, Inc - sketchy but might help
Search "undue burden" in 8th circuit
Apply filter "Labor & Employment"
Key #75k1225(4) - Requesting & choosing accommodations
EEOC v. M.G.H Family Health Center
Williams v. AT&T Mobility Services
Jurisdiction: 8th Circuit Boolean search "reasonable accommodations"
Cravens v. BCBS of KC :check:
!! Test for establishing a prima facie case comes from Benson v. Northwest Airlines jk Wooten :star:
Wooten v. Farmland Foods
CFR 1614.203 Rehabilitation Act
Jurisdiction: 8th Circuit; Boolean search "reasonable accommodations"
Alexander v. Northland Inn :black_flag:
Minnihan v. Mediacom Communications :black_flag:
U.S.C. 12111. Definitions - particularly QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL (flag says unconstitutional or preempted??) :warning: :check:
These ^^ 2 ^^ can be negated, though, because in U.S.C.A that certain definitions only apply to current NOT FORMER employees