Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
considerations/meta (Considerations (Exemptions (Statutory=no exemptions…
considerations/meta
Considerations
-
-
-
-
Check out NPS 6/2016 resource: landscape scale approach to mitigation adverse effect on historic properties
Consider NAHC’s role and capacity: rec’d 1332 requests for sacred lands inventory search, 3331 envt’l docs requesting their comments (commented on 250-300), only 2 staff/ region, 104 requests for AB52 consultation lists
CA register of historic places and national register of historic places—tools to document cultural properties under CEQA
-
-
CA forest practice rules 895.1, Criterion E, acknowledge cultural/ religious importance to Native Americans (is this used, in what ways?)
How do you define feasible (feasibility of mitigation measures, etc.)? Who makes that determination?
What evidence does a tribe need to provide to argue that a site is a TCR and needs to be protected, and what can they hold back/ not share?
-
Under PRC 210843A, public agencies have a statutory obligation to avoid TCRs, regardless of tribal participation. Is this upheld?
-