Lecture 9: Informal Urbanism – Slums Poverty and urban violence in the developing wold

Definitions:

  • Informal economy/informal sector


    • Waged jobs with no formal contract or labour rights
    • Self employed people/groups who operate either outside the law (illegal) or in the gaps in the law (extra-legal)
    • Little or no payment of taxes
  • Informal settlements/ informal housing – commonly slums


    • Residential areas built with little or no urban planning (by the state)
    • Housing built in contravention of laws and regulations
  • Often interlinked
  • Also criticised as definitions not quite clear but still commonly used

Conclusion

Urban Informality

Why does it matter?

  • Due to none legal status within city - usually lack access to legal rights (including property rights) and many basic services
  • Unplanned settlements often lack basic infrastructure (e.g. roads, water, drains)
    • poor construction
  • Difficult to plan when informal development takes up large parts of a city
    • difficult to demolish, issues of displacement
  • Lack of taxation means the state lacks resources to provide services and benefits
  • People living and working informally often vulnerable to violence, eviction, disease and other dangers
  • In many countries the majority of city-dwellers live in these conditions - global issue

Informality: pre-history


  • During colonial times, ‘native’ societies were viewed through a lens of dualism:
    • Distinction between ‘traditional’ and ‘modern’ economic activities/housing
    • The ‘traditional’ associated with the rural, but also with ‘urban peasants’ (bringing village life to cities); seen as stagnant and unproductive
    • A planned modern sector and an unplanned informal traditional area

The urban unemployed in the ‘Third World’ often seen by Marxists as:

  • A ‘reserve army’ of labour
    • Collection of poor people desperate to make money therefore can be used by the state and discarded anytime
  • The failure to provide waged jobs to city-dwellers was seen as a failure of capitalism in these societies

Keith Hart

coined term ‘informal sector’ after studying work outside of public/private waged jobs in Ghana


  • Rejected the Marxist idea of the urban ‘masses’ as ‘labour reserve’


  • Presented the activities of urban poor as economically dynamic: working in the ‘informal sector’ was their ‘salvation’


    • people being entrepreneurial through informal sector. People surviving by creating job for themselves

  • Such workers provide ‘many of the essential services on which life in the city is dependent’
    • Vendors etc

The International Labour Organisation (ILO) adopted the term in 1972, and defined it in relation to:
– Ease of entry
– Small scale of operation
– Family ownership
– Unregulated markets

Informality as salvation

After Hart and ILO report, informal sector seen as a ‘solution’ to unemployment

  • De Soto criticised the bureaucratic obstacles that informal workers had to face
    • Over-regulation was preventing informal workers’ potential
    • Informal enterprises reflect entrepreneurial spirit of the urban poor, which needs to be ‘unleashed’ through deregulation

Celebration of informality went well with the neoliberalism and free-market ideas:

  • Emphasis on ‘rolling back the state’ and liberating market forces
    • Helped legitimise the stopping of ISI (Import substitution)

  • Informal sector - very dynamic and vibrant

Marxist Interpretation

Many criticised this positive attitude to informal labour

  • Should we really celebrate the informal economy?
    • People who have been abandoned by the state and living in poor conditions
  • Ignores exploitative link between formal and informal sector
  • Part of capitalist mode of exploitation (Moser)
  • ‘Informalisation’ a deliberate strategy by formal sector to protect itself (cheap labour) (Meagher)

People also criticised idea of just one informal ‘sector’

  • All sectors of the economy contain elements of informality
  • Distinction between formal & informal is ‘utterly fuzzy’ (Peattie)
  • Gave rise to new alternative terms
    • E.g. ‘Second economy’; ‘real economy’; ‘shadow economy’; ‘grey economy’; ‘parallel economy’

Informal Housing

Informal response to housing deficit

  • Colonial investment confined to planned ‘white towns’, with little attention to ‘native’ areas
  • After Independence, city populations grew without control over planning and little urban public housing
    • This period coincided with the ‘urban bias’ thesis (countryside is economically poor because it is politically powerless) and failed efforts to address this by keeping people in rural areas (Fox)
  • People building in areas where land is available and not planned or regulated by state
  • No one building houses for poor as investment only given to cities
  • Public housing rarely exceeds 10% of total housing stock in low/middle-income countries
    • Rise of ‘self-help’ in place of new social housing
    • Often supported by ‘sites and services’ and ‘slum upgrading’ schemes in 1970s/80s
      • informal housing supported by state through offering basic services in area and cheap land
  • The only option most people had was to build or rent informally
  • Most low income areas remained (or became) slums

Sri Lanka as an exception

Sri Lanka – One Million Houses programme 1980s

  • One of the largest efforts to provide low-income communities in both rural & urban areas with improved infrastructure & shelter
  • Gave people basic blocks allowing them to develop it once financially able to
  • Based on flexible system of loans and community participation
  • State-driven programmes (rare but was successful)

Causes and persistence of slums

- Sean Fox argues many cities in power interested in keeping slums

  • because slum landlords make profit from slums, capital to be made
  • too much involvement can lose votes for political party, seen as interfering with people's lives
    • Syagga et al found that slums are big business for political elites:
  • 41% of Kibera’s (slum in Nairobi) landlords were government officials

  • Regression of taxation – lack of public investment for housing
    • No tax being paid as poor can’t afford to pay and rich refuse to pay, leaving a lack of public tax funds
  • ‘Poaching’ – houses built for poor people, but rich people end up buying to create profit
  • Slums may be due to failures of post-colonial states promising stuff to poor and fail on doing so

Exacerbated by withdrawal of the state from public provision of services

  • Neoliberalism ideas
  • Meant urban poverty rose by 50% in Latin America
  • Building housing for the poorest rarely profitable

Work in the informal economy

Statistics

  • Women are more likely than men to be working in the informal economy
  • 10-20% more likely in many African cities (Herrera et al)
  • On average, the ‘informal sector’ comprises 41% of GDP in African countries (International Labour Organisation)

Informal sector jobs

  • Street trade
  • Waste-pickers
  • Home-based work
  • Informal manufacturing
  • Informal service provision
  • Sex work
  • Informal transport
  • Informal construction

Informality in Global North

  • Informal economy accounts for around 26% of GDP in Italy and 12% in UK and 8.5% in USA
    • Link between informal work and large-scale migration from EU countries
    • engage in informal work due to difficult legal status
  • De-industrialisation has contributed to increased informality in UK
  • Increased concern about informal housing in the global North
    • Eg. Renting out garages in UK

Hong Kongs informal rooftop communities


  • World of informality buried in modern, rich cities
  • Hong Kong informal housing on roofs of buildings (out of public eye)
  • Shack-like dwellings
  • Unplanned settlements despite being in rich city
  • Contrast between rich urban city and informal settlements

Urban Poverty and Vulnerability

Why focus on urban poverty?

  • Most of the developing world’s poor still live in rural areas; BUT
    • Poverty is very clearly becoming more urban over time (Ravallion et al)
    • Data not reliable (old and not consistently collected) but shows poverty is becoming more urban and cities becoming poorer
    • The poor are urbanising faster than population as a whole
  • Rural poor are declining

Rural vs Urban poverty

• Urban poverty exists because cities attract poor people in search of a better life (Glaeser)

  • Cities have more opportunities


  • Judgements about rural vs urban poverty – how do you compare between rural/urban poverty


    • Is it better to be poorer in the city or poor in rural?
    • Not always about jobs/poverty, urbanisation may be due to personal/political reason

What does urban poverty look like?

  • $1 a day used to compare poverty in rural/urban areas
    • doesn't consider the inflated prices that comes with living in cities
    • a dollar may go far in rural but not in cities but both can still be considered poor

Key characteristics of urban poverty and vulnerability

  • Reliance on a monetised economy
  • Reliance on employment in the informal economy
  • Expensive and inadequate housing
  • Insecurity of tenure\ land can be repossessed
  • Lack of access to basic services and unaffordable services
  • Vulnerability to diseases and accidents
  • Environmental hazards
  • Exposure to violence and crime
  • Social fragmentation
  • Increasing experience of warfare and terrorist attacks

Intra-city inequalities

  • Location affects your mortality
  • City-wide indicators obscure urban deprivation due to high levels of wealth cheek by jowl with poverty
    • Some cities, GDP seems good but inequalities are so extreme they balance each other out. Extremely wealthy and the extremely poor
  • Urban gini coefficients (measure of inequality, 0-1,0 being equal, 1 being very unequal)
    • most extreme being 0.75 in Johannesburg
  • In Kibera slum people die on average a whole decade earlier than in non-slum areas of Nairobi
  • Life expectancy in deprived areas of Sheffield (Central and East) is 18 years lower than in wealthy areas (West)

Urban access to water and sanitation

  • Differences in costs of access to water
  • poor people dont have access to public tap water so buy of private vendors which is much more expensive

  • statistics from World Health Organisation about improved water/sanitation can be manipluated
    • EG: 15% of African urban-dwellers lack improved water provision
    • but around 40% lack adequate and safe water provision

Moser and asset portfolios

To improve people's prospects, need to look at what the poor already have and understand households ‘asset portfolios’ and strategies (Moser)

  • 5 aspects
    • Labour (women & children joining labour force)
    • Human capital (affects ability to mobilise labour, family members who are possibly educated?)
    • Productive assets (may have some bit of lend they can capitalise on and rent out)
    • Household relations (restructuring family members to increase income, someone looks after relative whilst other goes to work)
    • Social capital (neighbours who help each other, dynamic & impermanent; but eroded by violence)

The intangibility (not physical form) of many assets and vulnerabilities has implications for poverty-reduction programmes in cities

Urban Violence

The experience and threat of violence constantly cited by urban poor

  • Homicides cause more deaths than civil wars globally (Fox)
  • Impacts of urban violence on poverty and development are multifarious (Moser). E.g:
  • Drain on savings (costs of private security)
  • Reduced livelihood security and capabilities to earn income
  • Human capital impacts and gender inequality
  • Earnings lost through fear, injury and extortion
  • Erosion of social capital
  • Reduced investment of homes as it will probably be damaged or stolen


Informality and urban planning practice

Are cities inherently violent?


The urban paradox:

  • the very urbanism that makes cities dynamic and resilient (proximity, size, diversity) can also make them violent (people competing for space, conflicting ideas etc)
  • Yet there is nothing inevitable about urban violence

What then causes high levels of urban violence?

  • Connection to poverty, unstable political institutions and socioeconomic inequality
  • Recent research also highlights the importance of access to space/land and gender-based insecurity
  • Gender-based violence is rife in some contexts
    • A study of Karachi (Pakistan) found that 76% of women reported physical abuse, 12% sexual abuse and 100% verbal abuse

Planning with informality

  • Finding a way which planning can work with informality, supporting survival efforts of the urban poor rather than hindering them (Watson)
  • What to do about ‘gray space’ (Yiftachel):
    • People living/working informally are caught between legality/approval/safety and eviction/destruction/death
  • Planning creates informality
    • planning inscribed informality by designating some activities as authorised and others as unauthorised (Roy)
    • coming in and stating what is formal/what is informal
    • planners responsibility to make people vulnerable by deciding whats informal/formal

How can planning support informal homes and livelihood

  • The role of transport planning in providing access to work for marginlised populations
  • Do zoning regulations take into account that many people use the house as a place of work as well as home/shelter? Can we make the regulations flexible?
  • Are entirely new planning laws needed to replace old colonial ones?
  • Do urban plans enable to poor to access land for small-scale agriculture within the city?
  • How much space is there in transport nodes for trading etc?
  • Can violence and crime be tackled through urban design?

Operation Murambatsvina (negative example)

  • Huge slum clearance programmed where 700,000 people lost their home, livelihood or both
  • Affected 1/5 Zimbabweans
  • Political reasons for clearance since urban population mostly voted for the opposition
  • Used colonial British planning laws to enable clearance

Warwick Junction, Durban (positive example)

  • Innovative approach to planning by the municipal government to support informality in a major transport node
  • The junction attracted thousands of traders daily by the mid-1990s but was a neglected & dangerous ‘cesspit’; City Council launched Project in 1996
  • abandoned infrastructure where people lived and worked here
  • Government helped informal settlement by improving and regenerating it
  • Reconnected redundant freeway to pedestrian bridge & provided infrastructure & shelter
  • one of the first examples in South Africa celebrating informality

  • Planning needs to happen with rather than just for informal workers and slum-dwellers: you cannot wish informality away


  • Attention to the specifics of urban poverty – including vulnerability to violence – must factor into planning


  • Affordable public transport is key to addressing inequality and social exclusion (as well as providing jobs?)


  • Vulnerability among urban workers and slum-dwellers will persist without attention to structural drivers of informality


  • Urban job creation and moving beyond dependence on agriculture/ primary commodities will be key for many countries


  • Cultivating a sense of urban citizenship that includes the informal is important for political stability and social cohesion