Canada and World Affairs: disparity between academics and policy makers

Focus on fiscal responsibility

Tax breaks

Balance budget

Trade over aid

voter concerns not consistent with aid

acknowledge we have declined in position

not impetus to drastically increase spending

poor economy

Economy dependent on volatile sectors??

role as "middle power"

moral argument? Colonialism - have a larger moral duty to provide aid as reparations than us, who have never subjected these areas to being dependent.

inherent bias of political scientists. Must question

Critically analyze our suppositions

Start with the overall consensus made by researchers in field.

How do we align our ideals with budget in increasingly politicized environemnt. Non-partisan issue.

Increasing isolationist idealogy. Trump, Leitch and O'Leary??

Brexit, counter to TPP and CETA? Related?

Is this accurate? What about the other 2 ideas about our position in the world?

Argument comes up with every time international aid increases. What about our own. e.g. Syrian refugees.

Reparations to First Nations.

"competing interests"

homelessness, healthcare, education, etc.

Areas within Canada that could use stimulus and aid. Territories and reservations among the top needy areas.

Maybe we are contributing our fair share

Measurement of diplomacy overlooked in literature

Quality vs quantity spent

Possible solution is to engrain the formula into our constitution so it is harder to be amended.

Not a partisan issue, but a generational one??

DND spending different due to increase in non-state actors at play? Different approach required than traditional peacekeeper role (Rwanda and Bosnia)

Not a unique problem to political science. Tying practice to literature is an issue in many fields. Medicine is only recently embracing evidence-based practice.

International Liberalism still functioning?

Soft power vs hard power

Increasing role of domestic policing for security: paradiplomatic policing

role of interstate conflict vs intrastate conflict. End of cold-war?

argument often made reactionary to another expense, but it is a legitimate question. How much should we spend on other countries vs our own needy.