Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Challenges of an Earth Jurisprudential approach to conserving Severn…
Challenges of an Earth Jurisprudential approach to conserving Severn Estuary fish stocks
QUESTION 3: Would and earth jurisprudence based approach deal better with the pressures and issues identified in the case studies?
What would an earth jurisprudence based model of ownership look like?
How would it deal with the pressures and issues identified in the case studies?
QUESTION 1: Who owns the public right to fish in the UK?
What is the model of ownership?
Is this the same in all different parts (eg estuarine right out to 200nm)?
How does this model work?
who do rights (and duties and responsibilities) vest in?
what are the rights of ownership?
what are the duties and responsibilities (if any) of ownership?
QUESTION 2: How does the nature of the public right to fish in the UK impact upon fish stocks?
CASE STUDY: Severn Estuary
What are the pressures on and issues with fish stocks in the Severn Estuary?
How does the current model of the public right to fish deal with these pressures and issues?
CASE STUDY: Bay of Fundy?
What is the model of ownership in the Bay of Fundy?
What are the pressures on and issues with fish stocks in the Bay of Fundy?
How does the current model of the public right to fish in the Bay of Fundy deal with these pressures and issues?
Need to justify choice of case study areas
METHODOLOGY
Socio-legal
QUESTION 1 - "doctrinal plus"
Need to consider context of law and why it is as it is in order to be able to understand how it might be changed
QUESTION 2 - text-based initial research followed by key informant interviews
QUESTION 3 - "doctrinal plus" maybe coupled with some element of involvement with key informants to gauge opinions?
Legal Geography