Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Jurisdiction (Jurisdictional error of law S 6(2)(d) (NB (Administrative…
Jurisdiction
Jurisdictional error of fact Procedural jurisdictional facts
cond./ procedures met prior
then pubic functionary may exercise given power
‘Mandatory and material procedure’ = procedural facts; ‘condition’ = substantive facts
Procedures complied with prior decision
failure = unlawful
requirements: review
mandatory + material
mandatory + directory
'mandatory'
Sutter: Factors
Preremptory language
Neg formulation
Positive formulation + sanction
GR: leg penalises an act= prohib + invalid
Exceptions
2 more items...
courts
separated these:
Maharaj
Feinberg
KEY POINTS
Acts within powers
Jurisdictional errors
interpretation facts/ law
exceeding their jurisdiction
acting w/o jurisdiction
Non-jurisdictional errors
acting within
not exceed powers
no consequence for jurisdiction
Jurisdictional error of fact Substantive jurisdictional facts
Preconditions met/ exist prior to powers exercised
Objective
'has reason to believe' Lucky Horse Shoe
Substantive
Minister 'satisfied'
Derby-Lewis
Camps Bay
Waleke
Show subjective opinion based on reas grounds
All juris facts objectively justifiable
Dawood
Court's not like parlia granting:
broad / discretionary powers
unlikely subjective clauses
conferring exclusive power to admini
'is of the opinion' Lucky Horseshoe
Material Error: Fact
PAJA silent
Pepcor
Material errors provide basis for review w/o considering jurisdiction
Jurisdictional error of law S 6(2)(d)
Wrong/ mistaken interp. empowering provision
Judicial review
action was materially influenced by an error of law’.
NB
Administrative review
Process of making decisions
Judicial review
How the decision was made
Old CL approach
Failure: appreciate nature of discretion
prevented A appreciating nature of power
Juris/ Non Juris Dichotomy
Only Errors of law reviewable: misunderstood/ exceeded powers
New: Con Era
S 6(2)(d) PAJA Refugee Appeal Board