Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Formulate research design (Choosing research strategy: coherence of…

- - - - Concurrent mixed method: separate use of quali and quanti within single phase -> both result interpreted together
        
        concurrent triangulation design: collect data in same phase to compare and how they support one another
        
        pros: - richer data & shorter timescale and practical
      - sequential mixed method: in many phase
        
        double phae research design: 2 alternative mixed method reserach strategy
        +) sequential exploratory (quanli -> quanti)
        +) sequential explanatory (quanti -> quali)
        +) multi-phase design (quanti -> quali -> quanti...)
      - multi-phase
      - fully integrated mixed method: mix quali and quanti at every stage
        
        partially integrated mixed method: mix at certain stages
        +) quali can be presented diagrammatically/quati can use categorization
        +) priority: one dominant, one support, depend on the purpose of the research, preference and expectation
      - Embedded mixed method: one methodology support another
        
        concurrent embedded design: one methodology within other during sinlge mean to collect data
- - - - original not for research: - data from representative sample? - overcome threats to reliability and validity?
      - original for research:
        
        qualitative data: rich description of key event, role of actor, external influence
        
        quantitative data: access to actial data that may facilitate comparision
      - cons: denied access,missing, not consistent
  - - - pros: real-life
        
        not controlled
        
        able to understand the impact of context (use when bondaries of phenomenon and context are not clear)
      - cons: can't guarantee generalisable, reliable and theoretical assumption -> to reveal specific attributes
    - - Single: present a critical/extreme/unique, must be typical
      - Multiple: literal replication: case chosen on basis of similarity if result are predicted or produced from each one
        
        theoretical replication: case chosen on contextual factor is deliberately different
    - - holistic: organisation as a whole
      - embedded: sub-units/many units
  - - - propositional knowledge (abstract and theoretical knowledge)
      - experiential knowledge (participant's everyday experience)
      - know-in-action (from practical application)
    - - pros:
        
        participants have expectation in future treatment and involvment
        
        organization development and culture change
        
        develop theories that can be applied more widely
      - cons: many to consider:
        
        identify context
        
        engender participants for collab
        
        iteration needs time
  - - - open coding: reorganize of data into categories
      - axial coding: recogze relationship between categories
      - selective coding: integrate categories to produce theory
    - - collection of data: start as soon as research ideas is developed and initial research participant agree to take part -> must commit to the research idea
        
        identify core category
        
        confuse the role of published theory
        
        emergence of theory: avpod being satisfied to pre-existing (theory sensitivity)
        
        time