Strategy
Support for license fee dropping
Industry analysis:
Discuss the strategic groups that constitute the industry and identify major competitors within each strategic group.
Use this analysis to explain the evolution of the industry’s structure during the past decade or so.
Is the industry attractive?
Who are the major competitors?
Has the industry structure changed, for example, have barriers to entry become less significant, and if so, why?
What future changes are expected?
What are the critical success factors for competing in the industry now and in the future?
Own company analysis:
Analyze the organization’s own capabilities.
Are they valuable, rare and difficult to imitate?
Do they create a competitive advantage?
How sustainable is this advantage?
Are the organization’s capabilities a good ‘fit’ with the insights revealed from your industry analysis?
Why or why not?
Use your analyses to identify the current competitive position of the focal organization.
How desirable and sustainable is that competitive position?
Based upon your analysis, characterize the overall attractiveness of the firm’s competitive position within the industry. As much as possible, please provide data to back up your points.
Strategic recommendation:
Consider a set of strategic options to help strengthen and/or grow the business/organization given its current strategic position.
Identify three or four strategic initiatives that the organization could pursue. For example, it may make sense to analyze a corporate diversification strategy. In this case, identify the forms of diversification the firm could pursue (e.g. expansion across the value chain, into an adjacent industry, or internationally) and assess the reasons for and against such diversification and whether an ownership or contractual partnership is required.
For other firms, it may be interesting to look at potential Blue Ocean opportunities.
In all cases, assess the pros and cons of each strategic initiative, including the likely execution challenges.
Conclude by making a clear and specific recommendation for a particular course of action. This recommendation should flow from your analysis and be supported by facts and data when possible.
Threat of entry
- lishgefzlk
Supplier power
- Currently low - but expect to strengthen as global players make local plays (Find NetFlix local office article)
Buyer Power
- lkushfd
Internal Rivalry
- kjhzevf
Substitutes/Compliments
- jghfkmj
Introduction
Your report will be judged on the relevancy of your diagnosis, on the quality of your analysis of strategic options, and on the soundness of your recommendations.
● Overall, the report should be analytical, not descriptive. You should not merely present facts. When you state an opinion, you must provide analysis to support it.
● You should draw upon various analytical frameworks presented in class based on the specific situation of your company.
● You should search for articles and news items that touch directly or indirectly on the industry and company you have selected. You should attempt to locate articles that go back several years, not just the most recent ones. Magazine articles may provide more general background information while newspapers are more likely to deal with specific recent developments. Business or trade publications and company documents filed with regulators will provide you with more information. (Use the web with caution – stick with information posted by the firms themselves, established news or media firms, and universities)
click to edit
Muligheden for at indtage en faciliterende rolle for producenter - frem for selv at være producerende
Remember DAC: Direction, Alignment, Commitment
Main points of innovation:
More public in the service:
Getting to the young audience requires entering an "intimatesphere", that an institution like DR is not naturally invited into. Start facilitating others ideas/productions - and co-produce rather than originating everything ourselves.
Real life content to make the service unique compared to competitors. "Doublehitters" show strength in key content and ensure ability to maintain 2 platforms while required.
Allow users to follow their interests - not our platform-organisation. Vertical depth over horisontal breadth.
More service in the public:
Create real life impact through utilizing the PS-muscle to leverage real change (Ultra:Bit, Danmarkshistorien etc.)
Democratize distribution and allow consumption of our content on 3rd party platforms - and lead users back to DRTV.
Reduce friction and make unique and best in class streaming experience, that takes pride in being current and more diverse in content - at the expense of flow
click to edit