Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
The Synoptic Problem (Markan Priority (The observation that manuscripts…
The Synoptic Problem
Markan Priority
The observation that manuscripts remind of mark in the second and third century are as sparse as those of some non-canonical gospels
Gospels usually circulated individually, not in codices containing the four canonical gospels
-
-
Neither marks gospel nor Q were considered authoritative scripture when Matthew and Luke had written their gospels
Q Source
the overlap of written and oral traditions during the first and second centuries makes the mix of semantic overlap and variation that one observes in Q and Gos
The use of Q in a minimalist sense as a hypothetical source to explain how Matthew and Luke composed their gospels can be left indefinite
Many lists of Q will be more conservative, listing only the passages in which theres is a clear verbal overlap b/w Matthew /Luke that hadn't been derived from mark
-
The synoptic problem
Neither mark's gospel nor Q was considered authoritative scripture when Matthew and Luke wrote their gospels.
The evangelists have a close and dynamic relationship to the faith and practice of christian communities
A comprehensive explanation for all the data generated by detailed comparisons of the gospels would be more complex than the basic "two source" model
-
-