Agency
Authority
Ratification Authority: An agent acts without authority, but the principal later affirms the acts
Apparent Authority
Enforcement
Third Party v Agent
Principal v. Third Party
Third party v. Principal
Unidentified principal (partially disclosed): Exiistence but not identity is known to third party
Undisclosed principal: Both existence and identity of principal are unknown
Disclosed Principal: Existence and identity are known
Agent is generally not bound
Exception: Parties intend the agent will be liable
Exception: Agent's implied warranty of authority - agent is liable for actions taken "on behalf of principal" without authority
Agent is liable; generally the third party may elect which of agent/principal to bind
Agent is liable; generally the third party may elect which of agent/principal to bind
Generally: The third party is bound in contract to the principal
Disclosed principal
Unidentified/undisclosed principal
Principal, but not the agent may enforce the contract
Either principal or agent may enforce; principal is entitled to benefits
Exception: Fraudulent concealment of principal - principal may not enforce & third party may have the right to withdraw (affirmative misrepresentation)
Exception: Increased burden to third party (e.g. a requirements contract - the requirements of a mom-and-pop store (agent) are considerably less thatn the requirements of Walmart (principal)
When an agent acts with authority, the principal is bound (even if the principal is undisclosed or unidentified)
Actual Authority
Implied:: Authority the agent believes she has as a result of the act of the principal
Express (contined within 4 corners of oral/written agreement)
Specific language governs over general
Express authority is effective, even if granted based on a misrepresentation or mistakenly to an unintended agent
Extravagant language is interpreted conservatively
Extension of express authority: authority to use means reasonably necessary to carry out express grant
Custom and Usage known to Agent
Acquiescence - principal's acceptance or failiure to object to a series of unauthorized acts that reasonably lead thh agent to believeshe has the authority to continue similar acts
Emergency or necessity
Delegation - generally not permitted
Exception: Ministerial acts
Exception: delegation necessary because of circumstances/impossiblity (e.g. contractor may delegate authority to hire electrician), or custom of particular business,
Elements
Reasonable reliance by a third party
Actions of the principal
Inaction by the principal when there is a duty to act (e.g. to correct a statement by the "agent," made in his presence)
Affirmative action of the principal by word or conduct
Types
Agent exceeds actual authority: Agent previously exceeded & Principal is aware that 3d party knew of this fact
Lingering authority: An agent will continue to have authority as to a third party when the principal fails to notify a party, who knows of the agency from prior dealings (unless the agency knows or should have known of the termination
Imposters: Principal's negligence leads a 3d party to believe the imposter has actual authority
By position: An agent will have apparent authority to perform customary responsibilities for the position to which principal assigned him; secret limiting instructions do not limit the apparent authority vis-a-vis a third party
Elements
Methods
Principal knows, or should have known, all material facts at time of affirmance
Principal accepts entire transaction
Principal has capacity (competent & legal age) [Exam tip - do not discuss, unless facts suggest it is an issue]
No consideration required [Exam tip: Do not discuss unless facts suggest consideration is an issue, e.g. a defense asserted is lack of consideration]
Express
Implied
Silence when a duty exists to disaffirm, or
Principal brings a lawsuit involving the transaction
Accepts benefits of transaction when still possible to decline them, or