Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

OCCUPIERS LIABILITY (Who is the occupier/defendant? (Harris v Birkenhead…

- - - - TIME
        
        Stone v Taffe
        You have to make the visitor themselves aware of the time restriction otherwise the visitor will not be a trespasser
      - PURPOSE
        
        Smith & Jones
        D was a trespasser as, although he was allowed to be there, he was not allowed to steal and went outside of his purpose
      - AREA
        
        The Calgarth
        "When you invite a person into your house to use the staircase, you do not invite him to slide down the bannisters"
        
        Pearson v Coleman Brothers
        Because the young child didn't know she was not supposed to be there, she could be a licensee
      - Implied permission can be restricted by...
      - Express permission or licence can be restricted by...
      - NOTICE
        
        Edwards v Railway Exec
        Efforts were made to keep the children out therefore no implied permission
        
        Lowery v Walker
        Can change your mind and not allow visitors on your land however you must notify them of this change
        
        Cooke v GWR
        The gap in the fence was seen as implied permission for the children to come in and play as the workers knew about it but failed to mend it
      - Higgs v Foster
        Police need a warrant to search premises