Four Models of Technology Integration
SAMR: Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition
TIM:Technology of Integration Matrix
click to edit
click to edit
Five levels of technology integration in the curriculum: entry, adoption, adaptation, infusion, and trnasformation
click to edit
Matrix of 25 cells provides framework for how we teach: plan, implement, and evaluate technology in the classroom
click to edit
Gauges how activities and students' outcomes and results will be altered through technology
Technology is not a tool but is integrated into the instructional design and curriculum
click to edit
Hierarchy is similar to a ladder and requires an understanding of the TPACK model
Connection between SAMR progression of technology to Bloom's Taxonomy learning structure and levels of questioning
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
Three knowledge bases are not isolated
click to edit
click to edit
TPACK: Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
Three domains of knowledge and subdomains meet
click to edit
Venn diagram with technology integrated in the curriculum
click to edit
All domains together create effective teaching
Five meaningful learning environments: active, collaborative, constructive, authentic, goal-directed
Analogous to beginning teacher to seasoned teacher with growth mindset through years of practice
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
HACK: Highly structured, Allowed choices,Consistent Applications, Knowledge Centered
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
click to edit
Builds teacher capacity to become the facilitator of learning and transfer ownership to students
click to edit
Moves students from foundational level of knowledge to deeper understanding where students analyze, evaluate, and create information consistently
Aligned with Bloom's Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge
Gives a framework for moving from highly structured teacher control to knowledge and learner centered use