Stakeholders

Abercrombie and Fitch (The Company itself)

Mike Jeffries (Previous CEO)

American Eagle (Rival)

Overweight Women (The People affected)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (whether or not the hiring at A & F was discriminatory)

Stock holders in A & F (Lost money due to plummeting stocks)

Believes that all clothes should be all sizes. Likes the controversy because of increased business

Found that not hiring certain individuals due to looks is illegal

What they gain: Keeping the law in-tact of an anti-discriminatory environment

Believed that plus sizes weren't for women in his brand.

Opinion: Plus sizes for women shouldn't be sold in stores.

Opinion: A & F shouldn't be controversial, as their money plummeted.

Opinion: Discrimination is occurrung due to being singled out at A & F

What they lose: Allowing the freedom of choice at A & F

Nonbiased

What they lose: The fit/"popular" crowd (very unlikely)

What they gain: More traffic to their store from oversized people and ex-A&F people

Biased against A & F because they are business rivals

What he could lose: All respect by any human being

What he gains: Support of the people who originally wore the A & F brand

Holds true to his word that he believes that pretty people should be the only one in his clothes.

What they gain: Money back into the company

What they lose: The company could potentially go bankrupt

biased for the no plus size ideals

What they gain: Nothing, as the stocks continue to fall

What they lose: Their money invested into A & F

biased towards the hope that A & F is seen in a better light so the stocks quit dropping (they need people to shop there)

What they lose: A & F's approval (as if it matters at this point)

What they gain: Respect from A & F and the freedom of expression to not be ridiculed

Biased against A & F's discrimination of weight