The Controversy:
Black Hole Information Paradox
Major Writers/Speakers
Dr. 't Hooft
Dr. Hossenfleder
Dr. Danielsson, conference attendees, and the theoretical physics community
Dr. Hawking
Dr. Strominger
Dr. Perry
Key Groups/
Theory Catoegories
The new idea proposed by Hawking (in the event horizon which involves holography)
Quantum information just gone
Black hole 'remnants'
Info stored in 'mini' / separate universe or weird time stuff
simple "holography" (squish to 2-D instead of 3-D)
Where are these smarty-pants people talking?
Nordita Conference (Stockholm, Sweden)
Online
Formal Publications/ Journals
Twitter
YouTube
Online News
Reddit AMA feed
What are these
groups saying?
Hawking's proposed solution is true
The proposed solution is false
The proposed solution is true, but doesn't actually help us understand
The proposed solution needs to be verified by a peer-review process. Show us the math!
Values/Ideologies
of each group
Simple 'squished'
holography
Black hole remnants
Hawking's holography
idea (new)
It's just gone, man.
Multiverse/ Timey-wimey
Out with the old
Bandwagons are fun
Conservation of Quantum Information
Collaboration and Science
Old ideas still valid
Conservation of Q. Info.
Collaboration and Science
Simplicity, mathematical elegance
Conservation of Q. Info
Collaboration and Science
Follow the (semi)classical rules
Numbers don't lie. Even the ugly ones.
Collaboration and Science
Human intuition is useless here
Theory over possible verification
Technically following the rules
Collaboration and Science