Learning objective #3: connect the problem definition and the empirical findings with relevant theoretical approaches from previous SOL coursework
A Coggle Diagram about Sensemaking (Patterns of interact, Explains how do the dimensions become power, Go back to what we wrote in the paper: how do the power dimensions show up? Interpretative commitment in e.g. storytelling - how do they commit to the strategy? Lends the power to Nikolaj. and In the entire paper? storytelling and three Ps. texts as strategizing: how SM is involved in telling stories - how storytelling is used to gain an adv. or looking at how practitioners use the narrative of strategizing.
Practitioners: identities that are seen as key strategists -is there a story around that?
DEs roadmap of the BUs - how ppl find their identity in the BU and make sense of it.
This would be a very focused strategy on narratives, and we already include that. Power is used as an overarching umbrella term.
Extension: how power evolves.
New project: the dimensions of storytelling - narratives is the currency to sensemaking.), SAP and power (Kornberger & clegg and Flyvberg), Callon (Goffman -perfromativity) and framing, Leadership (Nye and Guthery & Jackson), Further research (Culture: and External perspective: adopt a more outside-in perspective), SAP (Whittington & Vaara) and Kaplan and technology (TO recognize that non-human actors also have power in the SM process. )